Editorial Policy
Enutrof is run by a small independent team. This page describes — without embellishment — how our content is produced and reviewed, what we claim, and what we explicitly do not claim.
- AI drafts + human review
- Source links where applicable
- Disclaimers stated explicitly
- Corrections welcomed
Who runs Enutrof
Enutrof is built and operated by a small independent team led by founder David Joung. We are not an academic institution or a panel of certified experts — we are a small team committed to bringing Eastern divinatory traditions to a global audience through modern AI.
AI usage disclosure
Blog articles, Saju/physiognomy readings, and translations across 13 languages are all generated by large language models, primarily Google Gemini. We draw on publicly available materials about Saju and physiognomy traditions and peer-reviewed research; the prose itself is written by AI.
Scope of human review
The team reviews each piece for tone, obvious factual errors, and policy compliance before publishing. We do not claim to academically fact-check every article, and we do not claim that Saju or physiognomy results literally predict the future.
Disclaimers
All readings on this site — Saju, face reading, soulmate, time-machine, dream interpretation, tarot, compatibility — are tools for self-reflection and entertainment. Saju and physiognomy are cultural traditions, not science. They must not be used as the basis for medical, legal, or financial decisions.
Translation limits
Translations across 13 languages are produced by AI and may contain awkward or inaccurate phrasing outside Korean and English. Email enutrof.hk@gmail.com with any specific translation issues you find.
Corrections and feedback
Found a factual error or unclear passage? Email enutrof.hk@gmail.com. We aim to respond within a few business days and roll the correction into the next review cycle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is every article AI-written?
Yes — drafts are produced by AI (primarily Google Gemini) and reviewed by the team for tone and obvious errors before publishing. Many articles include source links to the public research they reference.
Can I trust Saju and physiognomy results?
Our calculations match classical methods, but interpretations are tools for self-reflection — not predictions of the future.
I found a mistake — what should I do?
Email enutrof.hk@gmail.com. We will roll the correction into the next review cycle.